Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The scope of the journal is a social science, economics and business, health or technical topics that are still related to social and economic sciences. For example, mental health topics related to psychology and human capital related to human performance.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

Author's Duty

1. Authors must make reports or journals honestly and responsibly with actual or reliable data. There is no element of fraud or misleading from the reporting results or findings for any purpose. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behaviour.

2. Authors are asked to provide raw data relating to the journal for editorial review and must be prepared to provide public access to that data. if possible, and should be in any case. be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. This is necessary for terms of testing the reasonableness of the data. If there is a good calculation error due to an element of accident, a re-review can be done based on the available raw data.

3. The journal or report must be in original form and free of plagiarism. We use Turnitin software to test journal plagiarism. If a similarity of more than 30% is found, the journal is automatically rejected. If the similarity is less than 30% and more than 25% will be returned to the author to make major repairs.

4. Authors may not publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unacceptable publishing behaviour.

5. The author only cites the work of other people, both books and journals that are actually quoted and quotations on the content and references must be exact. If there is a mismatch between the quote and the reference of more than 3 mismatches, the submitted journal is automatically rejected if there is a mismatch of less than 3, the journal will be returned for a major correction.

6. Writing should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation or interpretation of the reported study. Everyone who has made a significant contribution must be registered as a co-author. If there are other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. Associated authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to submit it for publication. There is no limit to the name included in the paper as long as it is still in a reasonable stage. Inclusion of author names of more than 5 people must attach an explanation of each person's contribution. Inclusion of authors' names 3-5 people are suggested to include an explanation of each person's contribution. Authors of less than 3 people do not need to attach a statement of the contribution of each person.

7. If an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to revoke or correct the paper.


Editor's Duty

1. An editor at all times evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

2. Editors and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors and appropriate publishers.

3. Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

4. The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

5. The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.


Duties of Reviewers

1. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

2. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process

3. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

4. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

5. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

6. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.


Publication Indexing

We try to provide the best publication services for all authors around the world. For this reason, we have started indexing so that our publications can be found by readers around the world. Our publications are currently indexed and can be found at Google Books (100% indexed), Google Scholar (60% indexed), Book Finder (100% indexed), Scribd (60% Indexed), 24symbols (60% Indexed) Just Book (90% Indexed), Euro Buch (100% Indexed). Other publication indexers will follow soon so that the papers we publish can be easily found.